The Future of Court Operations: NJ Supreme Court issues new directive regarding in-person and virtual court proceedings

By way of a directive issued earlier today (a copy of which can be viewed here), the NJ Supreme Court has updated the guidelines relative to in-person and virtual court proceedings.

In particular, Special Civil Part trials and most Family Court proceedings will now be in-person. Effective March 1, 2023, involuntary civil commitments will be in-person. Routine conferences will continue to proceed virtually.

For criminal matters, the following proceedings will be in-person: jury and bench trials, evidentiary hearings, sentencing hearings, Final Extreme Risk Protective Order (FERPO) hearings, and Megan’s Law hearings. The following proceedings should be in-person, but can proceed virtually at the discretion of the Court: post-indictment arraignments, pretrial and other conferences, plea hearings, non-routine motions, and some proceedings involving Recovery Court (f/k/a Drug Court).

For municipal matters, the following proceedings will be in-person: trials, DWI/DUI matters, refusal to submit to a breathalyzer test, disorderly person and domestic violence matters, any matters that involve a reasonable likelihood of a jail sentence or license suspension, and any other matters that affect health and safety.

Many of these proceedings (with the exception of trials) can be conducted virtually with the consent of all parties.

Courts have been instructed to maintain reasonably sized calendars so litigants are not made to wait unreasonably long times before their matters are addressed.

No matter how you are scheduled to appear in Court, having an attorney who is familiar with the procedures and can guide you through the process is invaluable. Contact Alissa Hascup, Esq. 24/7 for a free consultation to discuss your criminal or municipal matter.

Paterson PD being chastised (again) for beating 19-year old during arrest

Just weeks after 6 officers from the Paterson Police Department were sentenced for targeting and abusing minorities in Paterson from 2016 to 2018, the Department is in the news again – this time for their conduct during the arrest of 19-year old Haneif Booker at a back-to-school block party. Booker, of Paterson, was arrested on… Continue Reading

Special Master issues report finding that DRE evidence satisfies the reliability standard and should be allowed as evidence

On November 18, 2019, the Supreme Court of NJ remanded the matter of State of NJ v. Michael Olenowski to a Special Master for a plenary hearing to consider and decide whether Drug Recognition Evaluator (“DRE”) evidence satisfies the reliability standard of NJ Evidence Rule 702 so as to allow its admissibility in evidence. Presiding… Continue Reading

Raritan man arrested for sexually assaulting women in Somerset County parks

Rogelio Calyeca Postrero, a 38-year old man who, until the date of his arrest, was residing in Raritan, has been arrested and charged with multiple counts of Aggravated Sexual Assault, Lewdness and Exhibiting False Government Documents, as per the Somerset County Prosecutor’s Office. Postrero was allegedly caught masturbating near a bridge in Raritan Borough last… Continue Reading

NJ Supreme Court rules that traffic stop for tinted window violation is unconstitutional

On June 28, 2022, the NJ Supreme Court issued its decision in the matter of State v. David L.Smith, which effectively narrowed the applicability of New Jersey’s window tint statute. N.J.S.A. 39:3-74 (the window tint statute) prohibits operation of a vehicle with any “non-transparent material” on the front windshield or front side windows.” As the… Continue Reading